Thursday, 18 August 2011

THE BIN LADEN DECADE

THE BIN LADEN DECADE

By MICHAEL HASTINGS







OSAMA BIN LADEN'S ACTIONS, AND OUR reactions to them, have defined my adult life. 1 was in New York City on September 11th, 2001, a senior in college. After the towers collapsed, I walked 95 blocks to get as close to Ground Zero as possible, so I could see first-hand the destruction that would define our future. By the time I got to Baghdad four years later, very few Americans believed that the people we were fighting in Iraq posed a threat to the United States. Even the military press didn't bother lying about it anymore, referring to our enemies as "insurgents" rather than "terrorists." A woman I loved was killed in Baghdad in January 2007 - Al Qaeda in Iraq took credit for it - and my younger brother fought for 15 months as an infantry platoon leader, earning a Bronze Star. Other friends, both American and Iraqi, suffered their own losses: homes, limbs, loved ones.


By the fall of 2008, when I had moved on to Afghanistan, bin Laden and Al Qaeda were barely footnotes to what we were doing there. "It's not about bin Laden,'" a military intelligence official told me. "It's about fixing the mess." This added to the growing despair Americans felt about the war: If it wasn't about bin Laden, then what the fuck was it about? Why were we fighting wars that took us no closer to the man responsible for unleashing the horror of September 11th? A top-ranking military official told me last year that he didn't think we'd ever get bin Laden. Yet each time our presidents and generals told us why we were still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, they always used bin Laden and September 11th as an excuse. As long as they insisted on fighting these wars we didn't need to fight, the wound to the American psyche wasn't allowed to heal.


Right from the start, the idea of the War on Terror was a fuzzy one at best. We were promised there would be no "battlefields and beachheads," as President George W. Bush put it. It would be a secret war, conducted mostly in the dark, no holds barred. And that's how it might have played had we got bin Laden early on, dead or alive. But that's not what happened. Instead, we went on a rampage in the full light of day. We got our battlefields and beachheads after all. Kabul, Kandahar, Baghdad, Fallujah, Ramadi, Najaf, Mosul, Kirkuk, Basra, Kabul and Kandahar again - the list went on and on. We couldn't find bin Laden, so we went after anyone who looked like him, searching for other monsters to put down: the Taliban, Saddam Hussein, Abu Musah al-Zarqawi.


In the end, bin Laden got the carnage he had hoped to unleash. Nearly 3,000 Americans were killed on September 11th. Since then, 6,022 American servicemen and women have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more than 42,000 have been wounded. More than 3,000 allied soldiers have died, along with some 1,200 private contractors, aid workers and journalists. Most of the killing didn't take place in battles - it was in the dirty metrics of suicide bombs, death squads, checkpoint killings, torture chambers and improvised explosive devices. Civilians on their way to work or soldiers driving around in circles, looking for an enemy they could seldom find. We may never know how many innocent civilians were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan and Pakistan, but estimates suggest that more than 160,000 have died so far. Al Qaeda, by contrast, has lost very few operatives in the worldwide conflagration - perhaps only "scores," as President Obama said this month. In truth, Al Qaeda never had many members to begin with. Not since Gavrilo Princip assassinated the Archduke Ferdinand, setting off World War I, has a conspiracy undertaken by so few been felt by so many.


After learning of bin Laden's death, I congratulated my friends in the military and the intelligence community, tweeted my appreciation to President Obama and his team, then sat back and listened to the horns honking outside my apartment in Washington. I thought of all the dead, and what adding this fucker's name to the list actually means. My hope - and it is not one I have much hope in - is that our political leaders will use bin Laden's death to put an end to the madness he provoked. Withdraw our remaining troops from Iraq, a country that never posed a threat to us. End the war in Afghanistan, where we will spend $120 billion this year to prevent the country from becoming a hideout for AI Qaeda. As bin Laden's death makes clear, our true enemies will always find a hideout, no matter how many people we torture and bribe and kill. For the past 10 years, we have used the name Osama bin Laden to justify our wars. Perhaps, now that he is dead, we can use it in the cause of peace.




And Blessed Are The Ones Who Care For Their Fellow Men!








Tuesday, 16 August 2011

PASSIVE TRANSFORMATION OF CONDITIONAL SENTENCES

PASSIVE TRANSFORMATION OF CONDITIONAL SENTENCES


Search Query:

16 Aug 21:12:53 www.google.com.pk passive of conditional 3



The grammatical rule underlying any passive transformation is based on the introduction of the auxiliary “be “ in all its tense forms , being present, past or future in addition to position shift between the subject and the object.

This rule is applicable to any sentence where the verb is transitive.

Let’s look at some examples.

The US government exerts pressure on file hosting servers.

In this sentence,

“The US government” is the subject,

“Exerts” is the main verb in the simple present tense,

“Pressure” is the object of the verb,

“On” is a preposition,

And “file hosting servers” is the object of the preposition “on”.

In any passive transformation we obviously ask the question “what” or “who” preceded by the verb.

In our example “exerts what?”

The answer is “pressure”.

So the word “pressure” will become the new subject of the passive transformation.

We introduce the correct form of the verb “be” in the simple present tense since the original verb “exerts” is in the simple present tense and we change our main verb into a past participle, taking into consideration whether it is regular or irregular and finally we introduce the “by” phrase and the subject of the active sentence, which is called the agent.

The sentence then becomes:

Pressure is exerted on file hosting servers by the US government.

That’s it.

Let’s go to the question asked over and over by visitors to this blog: the passive of conditional sentences.

Any conditional sentence can be transformed into the passive whatever type it is, type 1, 2 or 3 on condition the verb is transitive, which simply means that the verb has an object and obviously it answers the “what” or “who” question.

Conditional sentences are made up of two clauses, a “subordinate clause” which is the “if clause” and a “main clause”- a cause and an effect.

Let’s look at an example.

When there’s a cause-effect relationship between two sentences, a conditional sentence is always possible.

If the US government exerts too much pressure on file hosting servers, file sharing will soon die. ( “can” and “may” can be both used instead of “will”.)

Let’s ask the “what” question.

“Exert” what?

The answer is “too much pressure”.

So the passive transformation of our conditional sentence will be:

If too much pressure is exerted on file hosting servers (by the US government), file sharing will soon die.

Our example is of type 1.

We can follow the same steps in conditional type 2 , 3 or mixed conditionals.

The search quest of a visitor from Pakistan was about the passive of conditional type 3.

The passive transformation of conditional type 3 is as simple as that of conditional type 1 if we master our grammatical tools.

Let’s look at an example in conditional type 3 now.

Someone: he stole the money. They took him to jail.

There’s certainly a cause-effect relationship between these two sentences.

Since the time context in this situation is in the past, so, evidently, conditional type 3 is needed here.

And since the context, the reality of the situation is positive , we are going to imagine something which is totally the opposite, negative; hence conditional type 3 is called unreal or imaginary past.

If he hadn’t stolen the money, they wouldn’t have taken him to jail.

But the reality is: they took him to prison because he stole the money.

Let’s ask the “what” question.

He “had stolen” “what”?

The answer is “the money”.

So “the money” will become the new subject of conditional sentence in the passive.

The past participle transformation of the verb is not necessary since in conditional type 3 we need the past perfect.

And we need to introduce the verb “be” which is the key in any passive transformation.

The main verb in the active conditional sentence is in the past perfect, so “be” in the past perfect is “had been” and in our case it is “hadn’t been”.

Our sentence will become:

If the money hadn’t been stolen by him, they wouldn’t have taken him to jail.

Sometimes both clauses of the conditional sentences can be transformed into the passive and our example is no exception.

If the money hadn’t been stolen by him, he wouldn’t have been taken to jail.
That’s it.

I hope I’ve been as much clear as possible in my explanation.






And Blessed Are The Ones Who Care For Their Fellow Men!